Dialogues in Philosophy, Mental and Neuro Sciences

Official Journal of Crossing Dialogues

Dialogues in Philosophy, Mental and Neuro Sciences

The official journal of Crossing Dialogues

Volume 10, Issue 1 (June 2017)

NEW IDEAS

The mind-brain problem in psychiatry: why theoretical pluralism is better than theoretical monism


Alexander Moreira-Almeida & Saulo de Freitas Araujo

The mind-brain problem (MBP) is a persistent challenge in philosophy and science, having marked implications for psychiatry. In this paper, we claim that physicalism, a kind of theoretical monism, is usually taken by many psychiatrists as the only possible solution to the MBP, and argue that this may have negative consequences for the field.
Not only does it restrict the psychiatric training, thereby preventing professionals from considering and reflecting upon different perspectives on the MBP, but it also leads clinical psychiatrists to ignore alternatives in their research agendas and clinical care.
We suggest, therefore, that, as long as the MBP remains open and disputed by divergent views, theoretical monism should give place to theoretical pluralism in psychiatry.

Keywords:
mind-brain problem, psychiatry, theoretical monism, theoretical pluralism, philosophy of science, philosophy of mind

Dial Phil Ment Neuro Sci 2017; 10(1): 23-25

immagine di prova
download pdf

Received on May 04, 2017
Accepted on May 18, 2017
Firstly published online on July 11, 2017

ISSN 2035-0031 | ©2008 Associazione Crossing Dialogues, Rome - Italy | All Rights Reserved